LPA Board takes action on wakeboats
By Susan Thompson | Lake Panorama Times

John Rutledge
The Lake Panorama Association (LPA) Water Safety Committee held two meetings last fall. In addition to routine business, the committee was asked by the LPA board of directors to review two issues — boat density and wakeboat concerns specific to Lake Panorama.
In this month’s Q&A, John Rutledge, LPA general manager, shares information and recommendations the water safety committee provided to the board and board actions taken as a result of the committee’s work.
Q. Explain the role of the LPA Water Safety Committee and who serves on it.
A. Members of the LPA Water Safety Committee are appointed by the LPA board. This committee generally meets each spring and fall with additional meetings held as needed. The committee reviews boating rules and regulations, including topics such as vessel specifications, new developments in boating technology and design, and the LPA regulatory buoy map.
Those named to the water safety committee are Chip Hansen, Jake Martinson, Dave Nicholas, Theresa McConeghey, Mark Mertens, Todd Nevenhoven, Steve Sidman, Jackson Whiton and Dan York.
Last fall, the LPA board felt it would be helpful to establish an expanded committee to help explore the topics of boat density and wakeboats. Five past water safety committee members were appointed to serve in an advisory capacity. They were Mike Appleseth, Lyn Coulter, Emily Donovan, Doug Hemphill and Chad Tope. LPA staff members participating in advisory capacities were myself, Lane Rumelhart, LPA project manager, and Corey Larsen, LPA security supervisor. Phil Watson, owner of Panorama Marine, also joined the committee in an advisory capacity.
Q. One of the special issues this group tackled was boat density as it relates to Lake Panorama. Share some details from that discussion, and did the committee make recommendations to the LPA board on this issue?
A. The committee started by discussing whether boat density on Lake Panorama is a persistent or an intermittent concern. There was agreement this is an intermittent concern, which is most notable on holiday weekends, namely Memorial Day and Independence Day. The committee determined boat density is not a concern on most weekdays or during early mornings hours.
It was discussed that not every boat can feasibly be out at the same time, as owners of two boats will generally have only one on the water at a time. Also, many fulltime members take advantage of weekday boating and avoid boating during holiday weekends.
Boat ratio was another aspect of the boat density discussion. In 2025, there were about 1,700 boat stickers issued for the combined category of vessels more than 10 horsepower. This included ski boats, wakeboats, fishing boats, pontoon boats and personal watercraft.
LPA has about 1,700 memberships. With about 1,700 boats registered last season, the LPA is averaging one boat per membership or a 1:1 ratio. Yet, each membership is allowed to register two vessels more than 10 horsepower. This means potential registrations under LPA’s current rules and regulations could be 3,400 boats, a 2:1 ratio.
Committee members agreed a 1:1 ratio is good, and the thought of a 2:1 ratio is concerning. The committee encouraged the LPA board to be mindful that growing our membership brings with it the potential for more boat registrations. The committee suggested continued monitoring of the boat-to-membership ratio of 1:1 and to investigate options if that ratio begins to increase significantly.
The committee did not recommend any rule changes related to boat density. The committee consensus was the maintenance and enforcement of LPA’s boating rules are the most effective tool to ensure safe boating on Lake Panorama. The committee did urge the LPA board to maintain an unwavering position on boat length limits.
Q. The second special issue for the water safety committee was concerns about the operation of wakeboats on Lake Panorama. What was discussed, and what recommendations were made?
A. The committee reviewed several concerns related to wakeboat use on Lake Panorama. One was the impact of large wakes on other boaters. The LPA often receives complaints from pleasure boaters who have their boat rides disrupted by heavy wakes. The committee discussion focused on who bears responsibility when this happens and how this issue can be resolved.
Several suggestions were offered regarding how these instances can be avoided or minimized. Discussion focused on the ability of non-wakeboat captains to adjust course and avoid large wakes.
For boats in the main basin, the committee believed it’s often feasible for non-wakeboat captains to avoid large wakes. Wakeboats generally travel below 10 miles per hour, and the main basin usually provides enough space for an acceptable separation distance.
On the other hand, options are limited for non-wakeboat captains to avoid large wakes in the main channel of the lake, since large separation distances in areas where the lake narrows aren’t possible.
The committee agreed LPA should pursue a two-part educational effort. Wakeboat operators should be encouraged to avoid creating large wakes in the main channel, especially during busy times. This educational component also would encourage wakeboaters to operate in the main basin. This will provide the best conditions for them, while also avoiding impact to non-wakeboat operators in narrower sections of the lake.
Committee members agreed another part of this educational effort should encourage non-wakeboat captains to provide space to wakeboats operating in the main basin.
The committee also discussed the conduct of non-wakeboat captains who are pulling tubes. It’s often observed captains pulling tubes will intentionally use wake produced by nearby wakeboats to give their tubers an exhilarating ride. The committee stated this is a dangerous activity and should be discouraged as part of the educational effort.
One concern sometimes raised about wakeboats is that these damage a lake’s ecosystem. This concern was dismissed by the committee, because Lake Panorama is fed by the Middle Raccoon River and has a watershed ratio of about 234:1. To put it simply, Lake Panorama suffers from widespread siltation, which suffocates almost all vegetation on the lakebed. Lake Panorama functions more as a river than it does a lake, and, as a result, there is very little lake ecosystem to be disturbed.
The impact of wakeboats on shoreline rip rap also was reviewed by the committee. There was committee consensus that properly constructed rip rap should withstand wakeboat impact. Committee members noted the “push” of winter ice against shorelines has a more substantial impact than anything else, including wakes from wakeboats.
The impact of wakeboats to docks and lifts was deemed to be a legitimate concern. Several instances were noted where member boats were jostled within a lift, or lifts had to be reset from wake impact.
Q. After all these discussions and recommendations, did the LPA board vote to make some rule changes before the 2026 boating season?
A. The committee discussed some shortcomings of the current rules. Rule 5.1(m) states no vessel shall be operated within 50 feet of a shoreline, stationary vessel, dock or floundered skier at a speed in excess of 10 miles per hour. But this rule does not effectively address wakeboat concerns, since wakeboats frequently travel less than 10 miles per hour, and could travel more closely than desired to docks and lifts.
Also, Rule 5.1(n)(1) states no person shall be towed on skis or any other device within 100 feet of the shoreline. The committee said this rule should be amended in two ways.
First, it should be clear wakesports are addressed in the same rule section that covers towing. Second, the committee said wake surfing should be at least 100 feet from the edge of docks and lifts, regardless of speed.
At its December meeting, the LPA board accepted the recommendations of the water safety committee and approved changes to LPA rules related to boating operations.
The most significant change to the rules is that wakesport activities now must remain at least 100 feet from the edge of docks and lifts. This change was made in an effort to protect docks, lifts and vessels stored on lifts from the impact of large waves from wakeboats. If no docks or lifts are present, watersport activities must remain at least 100 feet from the shoreline.
The updated rule now includes clear definitions for both towing activities and wakesport activities. Also, the words “wakesport activities” were added in several locations in the new rule, making it clear wakesport activities are covered under the same rules as towing.
Following are the newly adopted regulations for boating operations on Lake Panorama.
5.1 BOATING OPERATIONS REGULATIONS
(m) Speed Limits
No vessel shall operate within 50 feet of any shoreline, stationary vessel, dock, or floundered skier at speeds greater than 10 mph.
(n) Activity Definitions and Limitations
1. Definitions
(a) Towing Activities: For the purposes of these Rules and Regulations, “towing” is defined as any activity in which one or more individuals are traveling behind a boat as a result of being pulled with a tow rope or similar apparatus (e.g., waterskiing, tubing, kneeboarding).
(b) Wakesport Activities: For the purposes of these Rules and Regulations, “wakesport activities” are defined as any activity in which one or more individuals are traveling behind a boat as a result of riding or utilizing the wake, or wave, created by the vessel, with or without the assistance of a tow line (e.g., wakesurfing, wakeboarding, wake foiling).
2. Distance Requirements
(a) Towing must remain at least 100 feet from the shoreline.
(b) Wakesport activities must remain at least 100 feet from the edge of docks and lifts. If no docks or lifts are present, wakesport activities must remain at least 100 feet from the shoreline.
3. Landing and Departing: No person may land or depart from the shore or dock area while engaged in towing or wakesport activities.
4. Marina Restrictions: Ski lines, tubes, and towables may not be pulled into the marina area. Wakesport activities are not allowed in the marina.
5. The Narrows Restrictions: No towing or wakesport activities are permitted from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays (Memorial Day through Labor Day). Special navigational buoys will mark restricted zones.
6. Security Chief Authority: The Security Chief may prohibit towing and wakesport activities in The Narrows during other high-traffic days by flagging center-line buoys between the upper basin and Sunset Beach.
7. Towable Limits: A maximum of two tubes or inflatable objects may be pulled behind a vessel.
(o) Observer Requirement
A vessel engaged in towing or wakesport activities shall have, in addition to the operator, another person nine (9) years of age or older positioned to observe the participant(s). Towing by remote-controlled devices, including but not limited to drones, is prohibited on Lake Panorama.
(p) Hours of Operation
Towing and wakesport activities are prohibited from one-half hour after sunset until sunrise, based on standard sunrise/sunset tables.
Q. At their December meeting, the LPA board also voted to eliminate the sale of guest boat passes. Tell us about that action?
A. For many years, the LPA has sold guest boat passes. These were available for non-holiday, weekday use only. Historically, the primary users of guest boat passes were people staying in Clover Ridge Interval Owners condos on Karen Drive, the motel on Karen Drive, home renters and guests of members.
The dissolution of the Clover Ridge Interval Owners group had a significant impact on the number of people requesting guest boat passes with only a few being sold in recent years.
Because of concerns raised about boating safety, boat density and boat operator competency, plus our ongoing efforts to keep invasive species out of Lake Panorama, the water safety committee recommended elimination of all guest boat passes. The LPA board approved this recommendation in December, putting an end to guest boat passes on Lake Panorama.
Q. Any closing thoughts on the topic of boating safety on Lake Panorama?
A. During discussions on boat density and wakeboats, the larger issue identified by members of the water safety committee was inexperienced boat operators and a general lack of common courtesy.
The committee encouraged LPA to increase messaging and education. Emphasis should be on the importance of becoming highly competent and experienced boat operators, regardless of the boat you own and operate.
The committee also said members should be encouraged not to allow inexperienced guests or relatives to drive their vessels, as experience is a major factor in ensuring safety on Lake Panorama.
The issue of wakeboats is one in which there are passionate viewpoints on both sides. A top priority of this effort was to ensure the result was one that brought the membership together for commonsense adjustments, and not one that divided the membership into pro-wakeboat and anti-wakeboat factions.
The effort to reach compromise is a priority for a couple of reasons. First, it is always best for the community when we can come together and work through challenging topics collaboratively. But, setting that aside, it’s simply good politics.
LPA’s authority to govern boating was brought into question by a 2023 court case, which involved Sun Valley Lake and a disgruntled member of the Sun Valley Lake Homeowners Association. The timing of this court case was fortunate, as it allowed us time to address this with the Iowa Legislature during the off season.
LPA was successful at re-establishing our authority to govern boating in the 2024 legislative session. This authority can be found in IA Code 462.17A and 462.17B.
I think it is very important to pursue collaborative solutions with our membership to ensure we’re not viewed as overreaching on our governance of boating. If the LPA were to be viewed as overreaching by our own membership, this could cause the Iowa Legislature to revisit the authority, and trust, they granted to us in the 2024 legislative session. This loss of authority would create substantially more safety concerns than anything we face today.
Throughout this effort, committee members commented there was no perfect solution to questions about boat density and wakeboat impact. But the recommendations developed by the committee and the action taken by the LPA board reflect a clear understanding that boating safety on Lake Panorama is best achieved through a collaborative effort that involves all stakeholders.